![]() Ambas familias cuentan con especies de importancia Mayoría de sus representantes son sarcosaprófagos, se alimentan de materia orgánicaĪnimal en estado de descomposición, lo que permite el reciclado y la incorporación de Rurales y urbanos, presentando una notable variabilidad en la estructura de susĬomunidades según el grado de intervención antrópica que presenten los ambientes. Tanto con ecosistemas forestales y vegetaciones abiertas, como así también a ambientes Sarcophagidae, dos familias pertenecientes a este grupo, incluyen especies asociadas This information could be used in the ecological, agronomy, sanitary, and forensic fields.ĭentro de los dípteros caliptrados (Diptera: Calyptratae), Oestroidea es uno de losĬlados más relevantes y diversificados en cuanto a sus variados modos de vida y losĭistintos papeles ecosistémicos que cumplen sus especies. Our results provide valuable information about the use of sarcosaprophagous muscids as indicators of disturbance of natural habitats and about possible health risks related to this family of Calyptratae flies previously unsurveyed in northeastern Argentina. Several species are classified as indicators of habitat as well as according to their index of synanthropy. ![]() ![]() The highest abundance was recorded in the urban habitat, while the highest species richness and diversity (Shannon-Wienner and Hill's numbers) were found in the rural habitat, supporting the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. We observed the effect of anthropization on the structuring of the assemblages and the presence of exotic species associated with human activity resulting from biotic homogenization. A total of 1,343 muscid flies were captured and identified to 7 genera and 24 species and morphospecies. The study focused on natural, rural, and urban habitats in San Lorenzo Department, Chaco Province, where sarcosaprophagous muscid flies were surveyed. The present study evaluated the role of anthropization in modulating Muscidae (Diptera) assemblages in the Humid Chaco ecoregion of Argentina, by testing the biotic homogenization and intermediate disturbance hypotheses. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of selecting the aims before sampling because each collecting method has advantages and disadvantages.ĭeforestation, agriculture, farmyard animal husbandry, and urbanization are known to be the main causes of biodiversity loss and habitat fragmentation. Furthermore, we provided information about the habit and habitat of 79 Coleoptera families. We present 30 types of collecting methods that the collector can employ in beetle surveys. For each habitat, in which beetles live, we included active and passive collecting methods. We structured the chapter grouping the methods according to beetle habitats (terrestrial, aquatic and semiaquatic, and subterranean), a specific topic for immatures, and mentioned collection methods for molecular studies. In this chapter, our objective is to provide information regarding the appropriate collecting methods for beetles relating to their habits and habitats. ![]() The survey is one tool widely used to answer ecological and taxonomic questions involving beetles, and the choice of proper collecting methods is usually a difficult task. Although they are responsible for agricultural and public health damage, beetles are essential in several ecological processes and ecosystem services. Most of them live in the terrestrial environment, but many species are aquatic or semiaquatic. Beetles are a very diverse group of insects, both in terms of food habits and distribution across different habitats. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |